Leadership philosophies

There argon m some(prenominal) types of turn overers philosophies that wholly submit a clearness of purpose to be successful. Their difference lies in their purpose of attack to dealing with the subject of leaders and followership. It is necessity to define leaders ism first before engaging in a long intervention on the types that comprise it. So what is exactly a leadership school of thought? Encarta defines school of thought as 1. Examination of basic concepts the branch of knowledge or academic study devoted to the systematic examination of basic concepts such(prenominal) as truth, existence, reality, causality, and freedom2. School of estimate a particular system of thought or doctrine 3. Guiding or key principles a slump of basic principles or concepts underlying a particular sphere of knowledge 4. Set of beliefs or aims a precept, or set of precepts, beliefs, principles, or aims, underlying somebodys practice or conduct lead philosophy is in that location of based on a set of inclinations and beliefs that set the character to how numerous hoi polloi experience their lives or envision their future. leadership philosophy is an understanding haved with a purpose for the aim of advancing the commonplace good.Leaders manipulation variant and various philosophies to motivate their followers whether those ar citizens or employees. The type of philosophy follow by a leader comm simply depends on the outcomes want. For instance, a common type of leadership philosophy adopted by business employers is enlightened philosophy where the ideas of the employees themselves ar used to change, rectify and advance the disposal. The leader assumes the intent of the guide and inquires into what pot would exchangeable to go steady within the organization thereby efficiently involving them in the process and making them feel useful.The employees or followers give their opinion, suggest the ideas they would like to look in reality comi ng out and compose a plan through which to achieve that. This e truly(prenominal) is done under the directive leadership of a psyche who assumes the role of counselor, advisor and guide without imposing his views on the process and thereby securing twain the entailwork forcet of the followers as intumesce as their productive happiness since they would feel more useful when they goat contri merelye to improving their lives with their ideas.Not all philosophies work or achieve the desired effect. One of the less successful philosophies, in contrast to the successful informatory type of leadership philosophy that has already been mentioned, is called the convocation conceive. It is very similar to the t separately philosophy where the people are supported to give their opinion and portion out their ideas. However what makes the groupingthink less desirable as a leadership philosophy is that it primarily supports the someone who develops the idea but does not examine the id ea in itself.(Baird) As a consequence of this, bad policies are ofttimes made official since the leaders role was limited to supporting instead of twain supporting and criticizing the ideas that were developed. It is because essential that a leader combines between the role of guide and critique in an open discussion of ideas exchange to two secure the inclusion of only good ideas as well as keep the ambiance competitive and fresh which would not happen if all ideas are passed.The neighboring type of leadership philosophy to be examined is called the dictatorial leadership and it is a way of life that is, as the name might suggest, salutary of tyranny and despotism which makes it thus very similar to dictatorship and al unitedly different from the two types of leadership styles that defecate been mentioned so far and that are more democratic in nature. The autocratic leadership style is in the main seen in governments just like the enlightening leadership philosophy is m ainly applied in businesses.The autocratic style involves more negative than convinced(p) sides and that is mainly because the type of rule associated with it is one of complete control and pretermit of freedom which goes against humans most basic need and essential human aspect. though this style is more likely to be found in governments businesses do have tyrants themselves. For instance a CEO may fire any employee who does not agree with him which connotes lack of diversity and a suffocated repressed atmosphere where the worker or citizen is not able to achieve his true(p) potential.The next example in leadership philosophy is the hired handmaid style of stellar(a) former(a)s. While most leaders tend to lead others with the assumption that that requires a certain traditional superior military strength, experience and research have proved that the inclusion of the followers in the process is more likely to perplex the desired results. A more depress and less arrogant mi litary position is therefore more appreciated from the leader himself. It is understandable and logical to think of leaders as little bit over the top figures who are in a way part of the group but nonoperational above it.But as stated, this approach might not produce the scoop out environment for all and therefore a servant leadership style is the best solution for the problem. Servant leadership opposes autocratic leadership and as has been exemplified autocratic leadership usually fails. Paul McDaniel in his article How to get along Servant Leadership illustrates the role of the servant leader very clear and eloquently in the followers news programs A servant leader acts as a steward to the organizations financial, human, and other resources.Servant Leadership emphasizes trust, empathy, collaboration, and the ethical use of power. At the heart of servant leadership, the case-by-case leader of an organization is a servant first. He or she makes a conscious decision to lea d in order to damp serve others, not to increase his or her own power. The servant leaders objective is to enhance the growth of individuals in the organization and increase teamwork and personal involvement. It is interesting to observe these different types of leadership and to as well reflect on what makes one more successful than another.In the case of servant leadership versus autocratic leadership the leader assumes the role of a humble servant to the others in the group thereby getting at hand(predicate) to them and ensure them that what matters is the advancement of the goals and the achievement of their purpose. After all true leadership emerges from the true desire to help others. Through becoming more familiar with the group one assures that arbitrary change is more assured as he back tooth allocate the different tasks in a more effective manner to those who can perform them best.It also controls the trust of the follower in the leader when the latters personality and agenda are better understood. Servant leadership is a way through which to foster trust into for each one other and creates an environment where the voice of every member counts which makes a joyful working and living environment more possible. Enlightening, autocratic and servant leadership have been mentioned so far. The next types of leadership philosophy that deserve a closer inspection are the ethical leadership..and the collective leadership. The latter is leaden to define since it is still a relatively new area which makes and many people have different theories about it. Collective leadership has been delimitate by Alain Gauthier as Co-leadership that embraces the diversity of people and perspectives and frees up self-initiative and collective intelligence. When full across sectors, it creates the conditions for societal learning and innovation through an increased wit of interdependence and a deeper trust in self-organization.It is commonly agreed that it incorpo rates heathenish and technological resources in a manner that allows people to work together better for the advancement of the communitys prosperity. Collective leadership is only possible when the members of a group have formed a closer bond with each other and therefore can work better together. Collectivity after all is more about the we than the I. Ethical Leadership is when the leader is very familiar with the essential values of his convictions and has the vision and courage to live up to them and include them in his work and realization of his goals.Ethical leadership combines between the intimate values and beliefs of the leader in uncertainty and the behavior and external conditions of the distant world. People who want to make a difference need to combine between their vision, and all that comes along with it in terms of integrity and clearness of purpose, and their commitment to do well and make a difference. Ethical leadership assumes that only through embracing the inner journey one can really express and realize the outer one. To understand what makes a person a leader it is essential to first grasp what differentiates him from a follower.A person does not need to be a hero to be a leader. Leadership does not come in one form or type and different type of people suit different forms of leadership. Leadership does not have a gender requirement. Men and women can both lead. The secret lies in convincing others of your ability to realize their dreams and advance the common good. As stated leadership comes in many forms just like the leader does. People naturally differ in how they define the word in itself and nobody can say that their vision is decent or wrong since the issue is broad and left to different interpretations.Followers naturally hold back leaders to show them things and set for them an example. They expect the leader to take lot of their needs and therefore it follows that being a leader is neither an effortless job nor one tha t anyone can conduct regarding the many responsibilities attached to it. Leadership philosophies are based on the vision and experiences of the leader. Leadership is neer dead(a) as it is always a subject of continues development depending on the helping and the different ideas the leader himself might develop over time.Leadership philosophy is therefore a subject of continues growth regarding its attachment to the human nature who is never stagnant and always seeks change and new ideas. Many of the leadership philosophies that are practiced nowadays were used by the Marine Corps and involve Justice, judgment, dependability, initiative, decisiveness, integrity, loyalty and inspiration(Leadership Philosophies). Each of these terms will be accustomed a ore thoughtful explanation in the following regarding the importance of each word in defining the various leadership philosophies and understanding them.Justice makes an individual more consistent and better valued. It makes the le ader countermand criticism of secernment and therefore decreases the tension in the group. The ability to use judgment to avoid being accused of favoring one person above the other is therefore very important for a leader. Dependability on the other hand is is the willing and voluntary support of the policies and orders of the chain of command (Wright, 1984/2002). Being tried means being reliable and therefore trustworthy which are apparently great and essential characteristic in a leader.Along with this goes initiative that shows enthusiasm and sets the example. A good leader needs to always set the right and best example to inspire the followers. (Leadership Philosophies) Decisiveness shows the ability to make a decision and therefore the ability to lead. This again increases the trust of the group in the leader and secures success. Loyalty on the other hand shows commitment to the group and its goals and enhances the trust of the people in the leader. It shows integrity and h onesty and these are essential traits of a good leadership philosophy.Leadership philosophies are very different but at the core they have the same purpose in mind which is leading. Leaders are thus guided by their leadership philosophy. The question that might arise in relevance to the different types of leadership is whether it is better as a leader to be feared or loved. As has been discussed antecedently autocratic leadership is less successful than the enlightening or servant form of leadership. However, Harvard professor Scott Snook provides a different interpretation of the issue.He illustrates through two examples that different leadership styles do not necessarily result in the success of one above the other. He argues that leadership is essentially influenced by human nature and therefore by the philosophy of the person in charge. Though different in approach both leaders still have the same vision which is success and achievement of goals. He provides the following two ex amples to enhance this theory further. Bobby Knight Bobby Knight, also known as The General, is the head coach at Texas Tech University.Hes a fiery, in-your-face taskmaster who leads through discipline and intimidation, which some critics say goes too far. Knight was pink-slipped from a long career at Indiana University for grabbing a student, and prior to that he was filmed clutching one of his own players by the neck. And then there was the infamous incident during a game when Knight tossed a turn up chair across the court to protest a referees call. Mike Krzyzewski Mike Krzyzewski, also known as Coach K, leads the mens basketball program at Duke University.Instead of fear, Krzyzewski relies heavily on positive reinforcement, open and warm communication, and caring support. For Coach K, Its about the heart, its about family, its about seeing the good in people and bringing the most out of them, says Snook. (Ambler) Both coaches achieved desirable results with their teams despit e the different leadership philosophies they believed in. To be successful in one of these types of leadership it is nonetheless essential to be fully convinced of it being the right style for you.Ones actions have to be in harmony with ones words and that is only guaranteed if the leader knows where he stands. The success of a leadership philosophy therefore depends on the leaders full awareness and adherence to it which is the only way through which to guarantee the right implementation of it. Leadership is about inspiring others. This leads the discussion to germinal leadership where leaders search for opportunities and introduce change through discovering them.Creative leadership is about solving problems no matter what they are as it evolves well-nigh finding new and creative methods to approach things. Creative leadership inspires people to do great things and encourages them to always improve their performance and keep their attitude at all times positive and forward-looking . People perform the postulate task for a manager but an inspirational leader makes them do their entire best and put all their effort in, not only for financial reasons but because they feel inspired. The following picture illustrates the working place of inspirational or creative leadership.