Discuss The Dramatic Presentation of Justice and Morality Essay

The crucible written by Arthur Miller, in 1953 is set in the midpoint of puritan 16th century America. The main plot is approximately the femme fatale hunts during that period and the lives that were affected by it. Although the dissemble is about the witch hunts in Salem in the 16th century, the sub plot is really referring to the wickedness that Miller himself was experiencing when he wrote it. In the work on, it was not only acceptable rule in Salem to accuse people of witchery (usually women) but it was to a fault acceptable to render them completely unable to defend themselves from such accusations.The companionships Puritanism, hysteria and conflicting views on morality and all that is full accounted for the horrendous tragedies to follow. Justice and morality are the main themes introduced throughout the play justice, core the administration of law according to prescribed and accepted principles and morality, meaning the degree to which something is morally acceptabl e. Many issues associated with justice and morality such as the stickyies and dangers of conforming to strict principles including the consequences of the misuse of justice are also high clear-cuted in the play.This essay result discuss those themes and how the audience is presented with them dramatically. The Crucible meaning something in which substances are melted at high temperatures could be referring to a cauldron used by witches or an explosive situation. The Crucible also bureau a severe test or trial which could be referring to the difficult decisions the char interpreters had to make. The ambiguity of the title makes it difficult for the audience to fully understand and augur the nature and mood of the play outrightly.Throughout the play the audience is subtly presented with particular emotive issues. Miller used the literary device of an metaphor to be able to depict them to maximum effect. He used visible radiation to convey emotions and tones, the same way he woul d a character. For object lesson the footnotes of act one mention a candle in the room and sunrays beam through the window giving the room an air of clean slenderness. This could be interpreted as reflecting the way in which the puritans perceived themselves, uninvolved from corruption or impurities.Throughout the play, light was used to symbolize opinions line drawing kindness, softer, to a greater extent sincere emotions or highlight good characters in the play. hardly as the plot thickens, Miller uses less light which draws the audience towards the end of the play. Dark lighting generally denotes bad atmosphere, for example the courtroom in Act Three is described as a solemn, forbidding go under even though light shone through the back window. Again, at the genuinely end of Act Four, when John Proctor is finally led away, man of the cloth oblige begins to pray and a light shines on his face.Again light is used to show raw emotions, and to portray both Proctor and Hale as good pious people. The language used throughout the play is archaic and biblical. Miller used biblical references throughout the play to patron further illustrate and highlight the extent of Puritanism in Salem and how pietism was the focal point of life in Salem. For example when Procter is pleading with high-flown Hale, he refers to him as Pontious Pilate a roman official who found saviour neither innocent nor guilty and washed his hands of the affair.However, it is more in all likelihood that Procters reference to the Bible was a subtle way of proving himself and his wife to be practicing Christians. Arthur Millers development of Abigail Williams character in The Crucible greatly affects the plot of the play. Her snobbishness and perceived superiority make many people believe in her lies. Her superiority complex stems from the concomitant that she was an unmarried orphan, this placed her at the bottom of the social hierarchy in Salem. Her resentment of those that betray ed her influenced many of her decisions.From the very beginning of the play, it is clear to all that Abigail was a mortal who craved control, albeit subtly at times. Miller used the literary device of juxtaposition to show this to the audience. Juxtaposition is when two or more things are placed next to each former(a) in golf club to create course and allow further analysis. In Act One, scene one where lofty Parris is praying over Betty, Abigail appears to be an innocent, concerned niece I get out never hurt Betty, i love her dearly. But as we see in the next scene, she threatens her own friends into silence.Let either of you reside a word, or the edge of a word about the other things, and i will come to you in the black of some abominable night and i will bring some pointy reckoning that will shudder you. And you know i can do it. The evil that make her capable of drinking chickens blood made the girls idolize her, so much so that when Procter asked Mary (his house helper) to tell the courts about Abigail she replied shell kill me for saying that. Juxtaposition was also used to show the contrary levels of morality between the characters.Throughout all the chaos of trying to discovery who is moral and who isnt, the audience is fully aware that Abigail was behind it all and she is the person lacking in morals. This made it possible for the audience to make the contrast between her and the other members of the community. Again Abigails acted superiority complex revealed itself when Reverend Parris asked her why no-one in the village had rehired her, she replied by saying how they wanted to subjugate her and how she would not blacken her face for any of them. This further illustrates her feelings towards the black slaves in the community.It was almost as if she was saying she would rather be without a stemma than lower herself to their level. It was this reasoning that made it so flaccid for her to use Tituba (Parris slave) as a scapegoat to take al l the blame for the witchery. It was also easy for the rest of the villagers to believe Abigails accusations because they too thought themselves better than Tituba. An example of this is in Act One where Tituba takes a step backwards in the lead attempting to talk to the reverend but he scrambles to his feet and quickly dismisses her.